You may want to believe insurers are hot competitors and never talk to each other. Except you would be wrong. There’s a steady flow of information into two central databases. The bigger and more important is called CLUE (Comprehensive Loss Underwriting Exchange) with the smaller competitor called A-PLUS (the Automated Property Loss Underwriting System run by Insurance Services Office Inc) which collect a broad range of information about you and how you relate to insurance companies. This is not just details of the claims you make. A range of factors are combined to produce an insurance score. This parallels the work done to create a credit score, and both scores are used by insurers to create a risk profile for you and set insurance rates. So, for example, both organizations record when you ask for clarification of your cover even though this does not result in a claim. It even records whether you are late in paying any of the premium installments. There’s also a positive effort made to collect public information about you, e.g. whether you are involved in litigation, have judgments against you, are subject to foreclosure orders, and so on. If any of this information is incorrect, it could mean you are only offered cover at high rates or you are refused cover. Because of this, many states have passed laws to give you basic rights. You will usually find your local rights set out on the site run by your state’s Insurance Commissioner.

The CLUE reports are sold by LexisNexis and provide information about all claims relating to your home or your vehicle. The key problem is that, if the score is very low, it could cause your home address to be blacklisted. While this might be an accurate assessment of your risk profile, it would do a significant injustice to anyone later buying your home. As an aside, all the information is stored for not less than five years so insurers use your history of claims to assess the risk you will file another.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act is supposed to help you by requiring insurers to tell you when they share your information with anyone else, except CLUE reports are excluded from the Act. This brings us to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) which does apply equally to credit and CLUE scoring. You have the right to ask LexisNexis and ISO Inc for one free copy of your insurance report every year. If you find any inaccuracies, you are entitled to have them corrected. If you feel the response of either LexisNexis or ISO Inc is unsatisfactory, you can insist a note is included in your file explaining your views. Unfortunately, you have no right to opt out of this sharing arrangement. Your insurers are entitled to continue sharing this information.

To protect yourself from higher home insurance quotes, you should routinely ask for a copy of your CLUE reports once a year. You also have a right to a free report if the insurer makes an “adverse decision” based on a CLUE report. The FCRA is there to protect your interests and, since home insurance rates can rise rapidly and without explanation, you should always find out what your insurance score is.

It’s a pretty well-known fact by now that the safety of a vehicle can be one of the determining factors when shopping for auto insurance quotes. This definition is influenced not just by your driving record, but also by the number of safety features and enhancements that are part of the vehicle itself. Now, new advantages in technology are focused not just on surviving crashes and maximizing passenger safety, but in proactively avoiding accidents entirely.

Advancements in testing
The testing process itself is improving, as more accurate crash test dummies are being used during testing. Dummy anatomy is now more reflective of actual humans, reacting more similarly under impact. There is also growing focus on diversity of crash test models, as the very young and the very old both have different physical characteristics that influence how much they may be impacted in the case of an accident. For example, elderly people are more prone to bone breakage, while young children have the added factor of car seats.

Increased protection
Passenger protection has come a long way in a short amount of time. Remember, seat belts in cars weren’t made mandatory by Congress until the 1960s. Other advances in technology that keep both passenger and driver safe include airbags, side airbags, and crumple zones that help move the collision impact away from those within the vehicle. Future advancements include inflatable rear safety belts, which essentially combine a seat belt with an airbag for optimum rear passenger protection.

Crash avoidance
The biggest trend in car safety technology is an overall shift toward preventing crashes in the first place rather than just minimizing the impact on passengers and vehicles. There has been much discussion of microchip-based safety systems which may eventually eliminate accidents entirely. Future vehicles could come equipped with communication capabilities that eliminate blind spots, allowing coordination with other vehicles to avoid not just collision, but even traffic congestion. Other possibilities include an electronic connection to the larger communications grid, allowing direct access to EMS services in case of an accident. In the future, vehicles may also be able to sense and remember the vitals of each passenger and adjust accordingly.

Passenger customization
Wouldn’t it be great to get away from the high auto insurance quotes for teen drivers? Some companies have the technology that could do just that. They’ve started designing electronic keys which set the car to each drivers’ preferences. The keys could then set limits on how fast the car can go with a certain driver, as well as limit distractions such as unsafe radio volume levels. These and other increased safety features can add up to big savings on auto insurance quotes, as well as safer passengers.

Apart from accepting a higher deductible, the main way of earning a discount with an insurer has always been to give the insurer more business. So, if your family owns three vehicles, you insure all three with the same company. If you also insure your home, want to cover your health costs or insure your life, a bundle has always been rewarded with sometimes quite substantial savings. But, here comes the problem. While insuring vehicles has consistently remained profitable, homeowners insurance has become increasingly challenging. Even though the US is one of the countries refusing any action on climate change in the current round of talks in Durban, the US insurance industry has recognized a major change in weather patterns over the last twenty years. That’s why you will now find it very difficult to get flooding coverage if you live anywhere near where the water level is known to rise, why hurricane damage is being defined to make it more difficult for you to claim, and why sinkhole, mudslide and earthquake coverage is getting more difficult in the areas at risk, i.e. the land drying out or being affected by more than the usual amount of rain.

In the past, companies would cross-subsidize, treating their profit on vehicle insurance as support for the other divisions. That’s no longer an option. The premium rates have been forced to rise faster than inflation because of the increasing levels of fraud and the rising costs of repairs. There comes a point when the other insurance divisions of home, health and life have to become more profitable. Allstate’s answer is to make it a condition of buying homeowners insurance that owners also buy vehicle insurance. The regulator in North Carolina has just allowed Allstate to drop 45,000 existing policyholders who refused to transfer their vehicle insurance. The same is happening in Arkansas. In most states, it’s lawful for insurers to give just 30 days notice of its intention not to renew. So here’s the big question for you. How will you react if you get a letter from an insurer threatening not to renew your homeowners policy unless you bundle cover together? Will this trigger a rush to other insurers who offer unconditional car insurance quotes? Ironically, it may force you to discover other companies actually have lower auto insurance rates.

The problem can be stated simply. If you take your eyes off the road, you will not see the other vehicle coming toward you. This makes you a danger to other road users. The group most likely to fall into this trap are young drivers. Not only are they the least experienced behind the wheel. They are also the ones with the most peer pressure to reply to the text message or answer the cell phone call immediately. The evidence cannot be more clear. Looking at all the different ways in which teens die through disease and accidents, crashes in motor-vehicles are the leading cause of death. The government estimates that, in 2009, about 5,500 people were killed and more than half-a-million injured because one of the drivers was distracted.

In a perfect world, this would be resolved by a discussion at home. As a parent, you would sit down with your children and explain the risks. The statistics are available on the internet to back up your warnings. Your children would nod their heads wisely and swear by all they hold holy not to continue this dangerous practice. Except this would not work in most families. What teens say to their parents is not how they act when they are outside the home. So now comes the hard choice. Do you sit back and rely on prayer every time they drive off into the wild blue yonder, or do you take positive steps? First, a little law: it’s a criminal offense to operate any transmitter that will block or jam wireless communications. So you would face big fines if you were found jamming mobile phone signals. But it’s probably not an offense if you instal equipment in your vehicle that acts as a passive block to the signal. The reason for the distinction is that if you created a cone of silence around your vehicle by transmitting a signal to jam all the cell towers, you would cut off all the other users in your area. While this might make the roads safer, it would seriously inconvenience everyone else. More importantly, it might interfere with emergency calls for the police and ambulance. So passive shielding is probably legal because it does not interfere with any other vehicle or person on the sidewalk. Taking this simple step means you no longer have trust issues with your teen (until he or she works out how to turn it off or get round the shielding, e.g. by putting an antenna outside the vehicle).

More intrusive are the camera systems now offered by some insurers. In return for allowing active monitoring of the way in which your teens drive, they get cheaper premium rates. So if your teen signs up for a policy and agrees not to text or use the cell phone, enforcement just became easier. Similarly, if there’s agreement limiting the number of passengers, you have it on disk. Yes this is cheap car insurance for your teen courtesy of Big Brother, but it’s also helping to keep him or her alive. Statistics show a remarkable improvement in driving when teens know the cameras are watching. So this all comes back to your door the next time you are looking for car insurance quotes. How far do you want to go?

Anyway, this cleverly named organization has just issued a Pulse Survey in which the insurance industry discovered that slightly more than half the people who buy their policies think the amount of cover is based on the resale value of their property and not the cost of rebuilding it. Slightly more than one-third reported reducing the amount of cover because the value of their homes had fallen and their mortgages were now underwater. Forgive the confusion here. It would be reasonable to reduce cover if the household budget was so strained they could no longer afford the full premium rate. But this finding suggests many mortgagors may now be in breach of the terms of their mortgages. Why, you ask. Because all mortgages require the borrowers to carry an adequate amount of cover. In this case, the amount should cover the cost of rebuilding assuming the building was a total loss. If the borrower fails to put adequate cover in place, the lender can substitute its own policy and add the premium to the monthly payments. It’s just too bad if that makes the mortgage payments unaffordable. As far as the lender is concerned, it’s your fault for cutting down on the amount of cover.

Let’s say you avoid the lender discovering your reduction in the cover but you then have to make a claim. Now the shock is going to become very expensive. Because the cost of materials and the labor to rebuild has been rising while the resale price of the buildings have been falling, it’s quite common to discover the amount insured is not enough to pay for the rebuilding. This should emphasize the importance of reviewing the amount amount of the insurance every year. Get at least two quotes from reputable local builders as your guide. This is particularly important if you have lavished special care on the building. The more you fit custom fixtures or improve on the fabric, the more it’s going to cost to reinstate. If there’s a shortfall, the difference comes out of your pocket. Those lenders have never been the most forgiving of people, so you could end up with your home as a pile of rubble and a civil action to recover the amount of the loan not covered by the homeowners insurance policy.

So before you decide to reduce your cover, remember the purpose of insurance. It’s supposed to protect you from financial disaster. Arbitrarily saving a few dollars on the monthly payments may turn out a false economy. Always look for alternative strategies. When you use a site like this to obtain your homeowners insurance quotes, run the process several times to find out whether you are eligible for discounts. It’s better to save money legitimately than to hide your head in the sand.

It all starts with your own safety record. If you’re involved in multiple accidents and claim large sums of money, the insurer will either hike the rates or refuse further cover. The same applies if you’re suddenly caught for some more serious moving violations. In some states, picking up any ticket entitles the insurer to surcharge, i.e. add an extra fee for continuing the insurance. With convictions for driving while intoxicated or under the influence, you instantly become a high-risk driver. Insurers will cancel the policy if you pick up more than an average number of criminal convictions. Remember the insurer checks your claims record and has access to the public records of criminal convictions, so it does no good to lie on your application. Once the dishonesty is recognized, the insurer will either refuse cover or cancel the policy. In some states, the safety record extends to all the members in a family. So although you and your partner may be safe, any children or relatives who regularly drive your vehicles can pull down the rating.

Then check out the discounts. Most insurers reduce the rates if you insure more than one vehicle or package the auto and home insurance together. Going back to your safety record, you earn a discount if you stay safe, making no claim and picking up no tickets. You may also be rewarded if you’re a non-smoker, have a good credit score and have a good GPA as a student. Now look at the safety of the vehicle itself. Some makes and models have better safety records and lower rates. If you have seat belts, passenger airbags and anti-lock brakes, there are usually discounts on the elements of the policy covering personal injuries. If in doubt, talk to an agent of the insurer or pick up the telephone and ask what discounts are available. Another standard strategy is to accept a higher deductible. Before you agree to this, ask yourself whether you could afford the cash payments if there are several accidents in a short period of time. Play your cards right and you should receive lower car insurance quotes. If the rates still seem high on the first set of quotes, change some of your decisions on make and model, the amount of the deductible, etc. Hopefully, the next set of car insurance quotes will be lower.

In all but three states, carrying a minimum amount of liability cover is mandatory yet, in many states up to 20% of all the drivers on the roads is driving uninsured. Let’s be straightforward about this. If everyone carried insurance, the cost of insurance for everyone would fall. As it is, the law-abiding have to pay more because the chances of being hit by someone uninsured or underinsured is increasingly high. It would be easy to link the computer records to allow the police agencies to check who owns a vehicle but is uninsured. If drivers believe they risk being caught, they are more likely to buy the insurance. Yet, when you listen to many local politicians, they resist allocating more money to the police. They say forcing people to buy insurance is like taxing poor drivers to be on the road.

But the number of drivers breaking the law is not restricted to the failure to insure. In a survey last year, more than four million adults admitted to driving while under the influence of drink or drugs. Curiously, one of the sources of information about the consequences of this admission is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its statistics show about one-third of all fatalities has one of the drivers with an excess of alcohol in their blood. In 2009, the CDC estimates more than 11,000 were killed by incapacitated drivers. Given the range of often quite serious penalties if caught, it’s revealing how many admit to driving while drunk. Most people believe they will avoid detection. In part, this is the confidence created by the alcohol, but it also reflects the number of police officers actually trying to catch drunk drivers. One the most common results of conviction for DWI/DUI offenses is the rise in the premium rates. In some states like Florida, the local laws increase the mandatory liability minimum as a precondition of being allowed to drive again. In other states, the insurers increase the rates on the basis that, with one conviction proving the driver a danger to other road users, trust has to be earned. This means paying higher premiums and not claiming for three or more years.

Cheap auto insurance would come our way if our politicians allocated proper resources to the police. Enforcing the law would make the roads safer for everyone and the premium rates would fall. Until this happens, the best you can hope for is affordable, not cheap auto insurance.

These are the days of political correctness where, on issues of gender, race, religion and other divisive issues, we are expected to remain civil and avoid anything that might stir up trouble. This actually makes life quite difficult because, if real change is going to be made, there must be an honest debate about the issues. So, for example, should men and women receive the same pay for the same work? This should not be controversial. If the employer benefits equally from the work done by both sexes, there’s no reason to reward one more than the other. Except there’s no transparency. Only a tiny percentage of employers make pay grades public, so it’s almost impossible to discover whether any group of individuals is being paid less than the average for that type of work. Now let’s turn the question around. Would you expect a man to be asked to pay more just because he’s a man?

It’s a statistical fact that women live longer than men, so let’s say a man and a woman of the same age ask for quotes to buy a life insurance policy with the same guaranteed death benefits. If the insurance companies base the quotes on the math, the man pays more because he will live for fewer years. There are two reasons for this. First, the man may not work for as long before ill-health forces retirement, i.e. the payments will stop. Second, as women live longer, there are more years for the investment of the payments to build up in value. So women can expect to pay less than men for the same product. Except this would be a positive discrimination on the basis of sex. Presumably that’s illegal.

Moving on to insuring drivers, it’s a statistical fact that women are safer drivers than men. They are more likely to obey the law and generally drive less recklessly. So even if they are involved in accidents, they are traveling more slowly and so there’s less injury to passengers and less damage to the vehicles. Because premium rates are based on the risk an insured will claim, women should pay less than men. Except, unless the insurance company offers a women-only policy, men and women are grouped together so there’s no problem in giving to same rates to individuals with the same safety records. The averages will simply show that women pay less than men.

Earlier this year, the European Court ordered the Member States to stop all discrimination. The Court’s reasoning is interesting. Insurance is about sharing the risk. That always means the good, the careful and the long-lived subsidize the rest. No one is quite sure how the insurance industry will react. Everyone is waiting to see what new laws are proposed. So here’s the question for you. How should American insurers set the auto insurance rates? Should men and women automatically pay the same, or should women be rewarded because they drive more carefully and claim less often? Or perhaps that’s a false choice. Do you think women should pay more, i.e. be made to subsidize the bad male drivers? The next time you’re getting auto insurance quotes, think about this issue. Should everyone have an incentive to drive like women because the rates for all will come down?

Insurance agencies use many factors to determine your rates. Credit, driving record, and age range help to estimate your potential risk as a client. But with today’s technology, companies can get an actual sample of your driving via electronic data-tracking devices, ultimately saving you money for responsible driving.

With the development of on-board computers in automobiles, every car now has a sort of “black box” that can record driving information and, with the right equipment, transfer information like top speeds and mileage. Several programs now exist in various parts of the United States, and they get you big discounts on your monthly premiums.

Device Tracking Programs

Allstate’s Drive Wise

This program offers discounts based on information collected from a device that you plug into your car’s onboard computer-available in all cars made since 1996. It measures mileage, hard braking, acceleration rates, time of day driven, and speed (when you exceed 80mph). This information is then automatically transmitted to Allstate. You can even check your performance online.

You receive a 10% discount just for signing up and up to 30% after your first policy period. The program cost is $10 per policy period.

Availability: Arizona, Illinois, Ohio

Progressive’s Snapshot

Similar to Allstate’s Drive Wise program, signing up for Snapshot transfers data to the insurance company for discounts measuring most of the same information.

You earn an initial discount after one month, and you send the device you installed back after 6 months. You are then eligible for another, permanent discount up to 30%. There is no cost to enroll and the data can’t hurt your rates.

Availability: 37 states

OnStar Programs

OnStar is a subsidiary of General Motors which allows subscribers a number of special features in their car, such as GPS navigation, emergency contact, vehicle diagnostics, hands-free calling, and other features. It is installed on all GM vehicles; new vehicles receive a free one-year subscription, and used vehicles receive a free 3-month subscription. This program has been integrated into two different mileage-based insurance programs.

GMAC’s Low-Mileage Discount

All GMAC customers who have a subscription to OnStar can enroll in this program, which is based entirely on mileage, for free.

Drive fewer than 15,000 miles per year and you will get a discount of at least 13% and up to 54% if you drive fewer than 2,500 miles per year.

Availability: 35 states

State Farm’s Drive Safe and Save

Also utilizing the OnStar system, Drive Safe and Save tracks your mileage and gives you up to 44% savings on your car insurance premiums. The driving is constantly updated though, so your discount will change every policy period based on your latest driving statistics.

Availability: California, Colorado, Illinois, Ohio, Texas

MileMeter

This Texas car insurance company offers insurance by the mile. Prices start at 2.5 cents per mile. No need any fancy electronic equipment for mileage tracking-all you have to do is send the company a picture of your odometer when you sign up and each time you renew your policy.

Availability: Texas only

Pre-1996 And Non-GM vehicles

Pre-1996 vehicles cannot be retrofitted with the OBD II diagnostic device. However, non-GM vehicles can be fitted with a custom rear-view mirror equipped with OnStar.

Michigan’s system of insurance for motor vehicles has been either praised or decried for years, depending on how you feel about government involvement in insurance. While always among the highest average premiums in the country, Michigan also has the best-protected drivers of any state. Now, however, it looks set to change, as new legislation comes up for debate in Lansing’s legislative bodies.

Cars, Insurance, and Natural Disasters

Will there be a new system? If so, what will it be like?

The Current Law: Benefits and Problems

Currently, the state of Michigan is the only state in the US to require all drivers buy unlimited medical and rehabilitation benefit coverage if they want to drive legally. This means that, if someone is injured in a crash, the insurance company covers all of their medical needs up to a point, from where the state assumes responsibility.

The upside of this has been very few lawsuits compared to other states, as well as the obvious benefit that is people having their injuries covered. It also still means that, if you want unlimited injury protection, Michigan is the cheapest place to get it.

The downside is that everybody, no matter their financial background, has had to buy high-priced insurance. It is true that not everybody can afford to buy coverage like this in Michigan, the state with the worst unemployment in the nation, which may be causing more uninsured illegal driving, rather than driving with a smaller level of coverage.

This has also been very expensive for the state. In order to make premium prices drop and allow everyone to afford the great coverage, Michigan set up the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association (MCCA), which reimburses fees that insured drivers receive after $500,000 of coverage through their insurer is surpassed. With nearly 13 thousand Michiganders on the books, the MCCA tab is simply too much for the state.

Possible Changes to Michigan’s Auto Coverage Mandates

State Republicans are the ones largely backing the proposed changes. They argue that the system is simply too expensive for the state. Eventually, they say, Michigan won’t be able to afford the bills and balance the budget � which its constitution requires it to do each year.

The changes would end the unlimited coverage mandates and allow people to get policies with a lower level of mandated coverage. The coverage levels being discussed are minimums of $50,000 to $200,000, government insiders believe.

The MCCA is also likely to stay open, but will not take on any future claims. Currently it operates with a $2.4 billion deficit, so it cannot really even afford to pay for everyone it does. To fix this, all motorists would be required to contribute a “pre-vehicle special assessment”, which amounts to a yearly fee. This year it would cost drivers $29.

The insurance industry and Republicans are in agreement on the changes to auto insurance mandates. A cynic would say the industry stands to make more money with the changes, but they say it is about consumers having a right to choose.

Legislation would also end the choice of an unlimited policy, capping auto insurance coverage at $5 million.

Healthcare workers, economists, and trial lawyers all stand against this auto insurance proposal. They argue it would increase healthcare costs, make unemployment worse, and hurt consumers.